Clicky optical switch software#

Then, of course, there’s the fact that the actuation points of the two switches were certainly different-remember, the LK switch actuates at least 0.5mm sooner than a normal mechanical switch, so you’ll always get disparate data if you press them at the same time. The performance of those two differently-sized keys, even if they were using the same switch on the same keyboard, will always be slightly different. In person, I noticed that the plastic bar was pressing down on a regular-sized key on the Bloody keyboard and a larger key on the no-name keyboard.

Clicky optical switch software#

To perform the test, the demonstrator presses down on the plastic bar, pushing down a key on each of the two keyboards simultaneously, and the software spits out the actuation data. The test is set up with a small piece of plastic, about the size and shape of a spacebar, straddling two keyboards-one a Bloody keyboard with LK switches and the other an unknown model with regular mechanical switches. Second, we have seen this test and the software in action, and although it’s certainly a great way to show off the switches’ capabilities on a tradeshow floor, it’s by no means scientific. Regarding such a claim: First of all, one should always be wary of a test that favors the entity that created both the test procedure and the testing software. It also claimed that its Key Response PK Software could demonstrate this speed. The company claimed that the LK switch could “respond” as fast as 0.2ms. LK switches actuate at 1.5mm-this, as opposed to the 2.0-2.2mm actuation of most standard mechanical switches-and A4tech said that the switch resets faster than most, too.